Skip to content

Templates

An interview scorecard template your team can actually use

A row of ratings does not tell the next interviewer why someone should progress. The useful part of a scorecard is the evidence attached to each rating.

Build the card before reviewing applicants. That gives your team a common set of questions to answer and makes disagreements easier to discuss. The template below is a starting point for a structured interview, not a validated selection test.

Choose criteria from the work

Write down the tasks the person will do in their first months. Pick the skills your screening step can reasonably observe. For a support role, those might include investigating a problem and writing a clear reply. A recorded screen cannot establish every skill in a job description.

Give each criterion a question or exercise that can produce evidence for it. Remove criteria that rely on a vague overall impression, such as 'culture fit'. Describe the relevant behaviour instead.

Copy the review sheet

Copy and adapt
Role:
Candidate:
Reviewer:
Question or exercise:

Criterion:
Evidence from the answer:
Rating: 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5 / insufficient evidence
What the rating means for this question:
Follow-up needed:

Overall recommendation: progress / discuss / do not progress / more evidence needed
Reason tied to the role criteria:
Open question for the next interviewer:

Use a separate criterion entry for each skill you are assessing. Keep the original answer available so another reviewer can check the note. Avoid pasting an AI summary into the evidence field without comparing it with the response.

Describe the rating before assigning it

RatingExample anchor for a support reply
1Misses the stated customer issue or makes a commitment outside the policy
3Explains a reasonable next step within the policy in understandable language
5Does the above and anticipates the information the customer will need next
Insufficient evidenceThe answer is missing, unclear or does not let the reviewer assess this criterion

Write anchors for the actual question. A short, accurate answer can be stronger than a long answer with several unsupported claims. If you weight criteria, agree on the weights before seeing candidates and record why those weights fit the role.

Try the card before the hiring round

Ask two reviewers to score the same sample answer independently. Compare their evidence notes before comparing the final numbers. If they disagree because the criterion means different things to them, rewrite it.

A sample can be a fictional answer written for this exercise. Label it as such. You do not need to put a real applicant through a scoring experiment to check whether your instructions are clear.

Keep the score in context

A total is a summary of the evidence you collected. It does not measure everything the candidate can do. Record a reason for the next step and carry unresolved questions into the live interview.

In Hirevly, reviewers can rate responses and add notes. Use a shared rubric alongside those reviews, check any optional AI observations against the original answer and give one person responsibility for the final decision.

Background: U.S. Office of Personnel Management on structured interviews

Putting this into practice?

See where Hirevly fits your hiring process

From reading to your next role

Try your next screening round in Hirevly.

Create questions, invite candidates and review their answers with your team. The free plan includes five interviews.